Having now completed our
two minute opening scene, it is interesting and quite amusing to look back at
our preliminary task from last year. It is clear that we have made improvements
to our film making skills, and it is intriguing to see the comparison between
the two as it allows us to understand how we have progressed and learnt from
our mistakes. Although in most cases, our two minute opening is significantly
better, it is still not entirely up to scratch, however from looking back at our
preliminary task we are pleased with the improvements we have made and that we
have been able to put what we have learnt into practice.
There
are a large number of differences between our preliminary task and opening
scene, such as the location, types of shots and different scenes; however this
was mainly due to the very limited preparation and time we were given. I think
the most distinct difference between the two is the filming location. As we
were given the instructions for our preliminary task under short notice, we had
very little choice over where to film, and chose our location more for
practicality rather than anything else. This meant that the use of different
shots we could use were also reduced, which shows significantly as the
preliminary task is much more static and unrealistic. As you can see, this
meant our preliminary was filmed in a classroom (the only one we could find
available) whereas we purposely chose to use our protagonist's house for the
opening scene. Similarly, we had no plot or script drafted, apart from the need
to include “What are you doing here?” into the scene. Although the line that we
needed to incorporate helped to give us structure, I also think it made it
slightly more difficult to come up with an idea for the scene as it limited our
choices and ideas. Despite this, the main focus point was the use of camera
work and so this is what we chose to focus on.
The
acting and plot line of the preliminary task paled in comparison with our final
opening. As the preliminary task was solely conceived in less than an hour,
there was minimal dialogue and we had little time to come up with anything.
Although our main focus was the camera work, I feel that if we had more time to
come up with a stronger plot line with more dialogue, we would have had the
chance to incorporate different camera angles in order to suit the mood.
Despite this, our opening two minutes has even less dialogue which may come as
a surprise. From our preliminary task, we learnt that we were not convincing
enough to successfully portray a polished screenplay with a greater performance
if we included dialogue. Although our actors would have had more time to
practice, it must be remembered that essentially, they are not actors and
actually have minimal experience in the area. We felt that including dialogue
would in fact devalue the production value, and furthermore, we did not feel
that dialogue fitted, nor was necessary in our plot. With the opening two
minutes, we have an almost complete storyline as an extension of the events
whereas the preliminary task only existed as a stand-alone project. Similarly,
the quality of our camera work was at a much higher standard due to the more
advanced technology we used, which produced a more realistic lighting. This is
illustrated through the yellowish colour the lower quality camera produced,
combined with our lack of editing and colour grading. In our opening scene, a
similar shot is shown through a much more realistic colour, which we purposely
chose to make quite dull and cold in order to help illustrate the genres.
Something
we also took into greater consideration was the colour of the film. We didn’t
even think about using colour correction and grading in our preliminary, mainly
because we were unaware that even existed, but partially because our time
was restricted. I believed that we filmed our preliminary task in the wrong way
because we decided to film each movement in different scenes and the edit them
together whereas many other filmed theirs in just a few shots. Although our
process was longer, it taught us more about the editing software and how we
could cut and match our scenes in order to make them flow more effortlessly.
Similarly, we paid greater attention to the use of colour in our opening.
Because of our other commitments and limited time, we were forced to film
different scenes on different days. Evidently, the lighting differed slightly
due to the different time and weather, which was more noticeable than we
thought. To overcome this, we had to adapt our plot and change the time period
it was set in, to make it look like she was running at dusk. This provided
reasoning behind the change in lighting and colour of the shots, however did
not solve the problem completely. We needed to use colour grading tools in
order to try and lighten some scenes as they came our darker than they appeared
on the camera. Due to both a combination of our knowledge and the skills of the
software, the colour grading was not fantastic but it sufficed. This is
definitely something we gained from experience and something which added and
improved our opening scene from our inexperienced preliminary. As mentioned
before, the different colours of the scenes were partly due to the quality of
the camera, but also because of editing and the location. Due to our restricted
time, we were forced to use a classroom for our preliminary, meaning we had
very little choice on the lighting. Despite this, lighting was something we had
very little experience with and I believe we didn't even take it into
consideration at all. This is shown through the lighting across my face which
detracts from the dialogue. Alternatively, we lowered the lighting using the
colour grading tools in our final piece in order to make it seem less friendly
and lower the mood, hoping to conform to our genres.
While we tried to employ
the continuity and editing techniques we had been taught, we were inexperienced
to say the last. The preliminary task turned out better than expected
considering we didn’t know what we were doing, however when we came to editing
it we were certainly aware of the mistakes we had made. One of the main things
we had learnt was that we needed to start filming before we were actually
ready, at then we could cut it down in the editing process. We were unaware
that we could do this when we started which is why some of the cuts are very
sharp and overly noticeable, which is something we didn’t want. We adhered to
the conventional camera techniques in our preliminary task, such as
match-on-action and shot reverse shot as the main purpose of the task was to
practice and get used to using the techniques as they are so vital in
successful films. We did try to employ the use of these techniques in our opening two minutes, however I don’t believed we used match-on-action anywhere near as much as stereotypically expected in action films it did not suit any of the scenes, and so we believed it would have been unnecessary just to add it in for the sake of it. We found that our preliminary task incorporated more of the typical camera techniques due to the heavy focus on camera work, whereas we found it more difficult to use of all the technical areas in our film as we had so much to concentrate on. Although we did pay attention to the camera techniques we used, we felt it they didn’t suit the plot very well and so focused on the different use of camera angles instead in order to prevent the scenes from looking static and unrealistic. Due to the genres and the pace of the film we also found we paid more attention to the 180 degree rule in our preliminary rather than in our opening two minutes. This may have been because we were slightly more experienced and so were not forcing ourselves to use it as it came more naturally. Despite this, we did not use this technique that much and although we could have adapted the plot to fit it in like the other techniques, we did not feel that it was necessary.
Overall,
we felt our preliminary task was instrumental in the creation of what we feel
is a satisfactory opening sequence. This is because of the mistakes we made,
such as cutting scenes short and the need for editing which enabled us to get
to know the software and techniques, helping us to improve our knowledge and
therefore produce a higher quality piece of work. Although many of the
techniques we used did not come in useful in our opening scene, they did
increase our knowledge of the industry and provided reasoning and understanding
behind different features of films. I believe that the use and timing of these
techniques is dependent on the genre and pace of the film, and for that reason
found it unnecessary to involve them. However if the film had carried on and we
had been allowed longer scenes, I’m sure we would have found good use for them.
Without filming such a thing beforehand, we would not have acquired the skills
and understanding that would allow our opening to succeed on various levels,
and I think we are all pleased with the outcome, despite further improvements
which could be made.
No comments:
Post a Comment